<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time dictates&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simon-law.com/archives/184/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simon-law.com/archives/184</link>
	<description>Sporadic thoughts - mostly about communications, brands, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amelia Torode</title>
		<link>http://www.simon-law.com/archives/184/comment-page-1#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia Torode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simon-law.com/archives/184#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Really agree with you wrote, I posted about something that I am starting to call the JFK Approach to Digital Comms, would love to get your thoughts!
http://ameliatorode.typepad.com/life_moves_pretty_fast/2007/03/the_jkf_approac.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really agree with you wrote, I posted about something that I am starting to call the JFK Approach to Digital Comms, would love to get your thoughts!<br />
<a href="http://ameliatorode.typepad.com/life_moves_pretty_fast/2007/03/the_jkf_approac.html" rel="nofollow">http://ameliatorode.typepad.com/life_moves_pretty_fast/2007/03/the_jkf_approac.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.simon-law.com/archives/184/comment-page-1#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simon-law.com/archives/184#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Spot on. I read a great paper years ago... if I find it I&#039;ll post it on my blog.. anyhow, the title of the paper was Chameleon Branding. It went into great depth and wonderfully cohesive arguments for your very point. 

Brands at their core must stay consistent, lest the consumer become confused. But brands, especially today, must have depth and breadth in order to maintain relevancy in our lives. Just as people have a core being, a primary &quot;brand&quot; that everyone acknowledges, as complex creatures people also have facets which they show or hide (minimize) depending on the audiences they are participating with at any given time. Just as a chameleon blends into its sourroundings, but is always still a chameleon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on. I read a great paper years ago&#8230; if I find it I&#8217;ll post it on my blog.. anyhow, the title of the paper was Chameleon Branding. It went into great depth and wonderfully cohesive arguments for your very point. </p>
<p>Brands at their core must stay consistent, lest the consumer become confused. But brands, especially today, must have depth and breadth in order to maintain relevancy in our lives. Just as people have a core being, a primary &#8220;brand&#8221; that everyone acknowledges, as complex creatures people also have facets which they show or hide (minimize) depending on the audiences they are participating with at any given time. Just as a chameleon blends into its sourroundings, but is always still a chameleon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.simon-law.com/archives/184/comment-page-1#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simon-law.com/archives/184#comment-250</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a huge proponent of using blogs as a marketing/PR tool for clients, unless it suits the size (tiny) and type (niche-y) of company (see gapingvoid.com). But the thing that strikes me about blogging is that providing the content is relevant, engaging, and current, people will spend time reading it.

So surely this should influence the way we go about presenting brands online. I’m sure there’d be some statistics out there that say that people spend an average of 1.17 (or some such) minutes viewing any given website, but I think if we structured content, as you say, in worthwhile digestible chunks, we have a greater chance of controlling the average time spent statistics, and therefore building stronger connections with customers.

But whichever way you fry it, the time factor indeed dictates a different approach, in exactly the same way copy-writers would attack a magazine print ad and a billboard differently.

(also, thanks for the plug.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a huge proponent of using blogs as a marketing/PR tool for clients, unless it suits the size (tiny) and type (niche-y) of company (see gapingvoid.com). But the thing that strikes me about blogging is that providing the content is relevant, engaging, and current, people will spend time reading it.</p>
<p>So surely this should influence the way we go about presenting brands online. I’m sure there’d be some statistics out there that say that people spend an average of 1.17 (or some such) minutes viewing any given website, but I think if we structured content, as you say, in worthwhile digestible chunks, we have a greater chance of controlling the average time spent statistics, and therefore building stronger connections with customers.</p>
<p>But whichever way you fry it, the time factor indeed dictates a different approach, in exactly the same way copy-writers would attack a magazine print ad and a billboard differently.</p>
<p>(also, thanks for the plug.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

