The University of Florida, Florida State University found that physically attractive people almost instantly attract the attention of the interlocutor, sobesednitsy with them, literally, it is difficult to make eye. This conclusion was reached by a series of psychological experiments, which were determined by the people who believe in sending the first seconds after the acquaintance. Here, a curious feature: single, unmarried experimental preferred to look at the guys, beauty opposite sex, and family, people most often by representatives of their sex.

The authors believe that this feature developed a behavior as a result of the evolution: a man trying to find a decent pair to acquire offspring. If this is resolved, he wondered potential rivals. Detailed information about this magazine will be published Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

In turn, a joint study of the Rockefeller University, Rockefeller University and Duke University, Duke University in North Carolina revealed that women are perceived differently by men smell. During experiments studied the perception of women one of the ingredients of male pheromone-androstenona smell, which is contained in urine or sweat.

The results were startling: women are part of this repugnant odor, and the other part is very attractive, resembling the smell of vanilla, and the third group have not felt any smell. The authors argue that the reason is that the differences in the receptor responsible for the olfactory system, from different people are different.

It has long been proven that mammals (including human) odor is one way of attracting the attention of representatives of the opposite sex. A detailed article about the journal Nature will publish.

I could easily see bloggers starting to self-organize themselves (herd) and govern their metaphysical “city states” by agreed upon standards and identifications.

Whereas the idea of ‘blogging journalism’ fills me with genuine dread.
Politics and religion have long been taboo subjects outside of close company for good reason.
If you don’t know a lot about what you’re talking about, you are likely to make naive decisions and comments based purely on personal bias.

Hey ho.

The reason, I feel, that Russell’s Account Planning School of the Web was critiqued was that it purported to teach Juniors about planning – and some of the tasks were picked apart as being shallow.

Personally, I don’t think junior planners or planning wannabes are THAT naive; we can tell when something is written to provoke or amuse – it’s no more dangerous than over-reading Campaign and imagining that it’s all long lunches and fat expense accounts.