http://www.simon-law.com/archives/391 Sporadic thoughts - mostly about communications, brands, etc... Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:12:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.simon-law.com/archives/391/comment-page-1#comment-775 Simon Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:33:44 +0000 http://www.simon-law.com/archives/391#comment-775 Isn't that what this is, though - sponsoring the sort of entertainment that people really enjoy on YouTube, but doing it publicly, so more people see it. If so, is that so wrong? Or so pointless? I like this for the discussion it will prompt - and part of that will be a discussion that normal people have - some people will really not like it - and that gives for more conversation. But, it is a trick you can only play a few times before people tire of it. Isn’t that what this is, though – sponsoring the sort of entertainment that people really enjoy on YouTube, but doing it publicly, so more people see it. If so, is that so wrong? Or so pointless?
I like this for the discussion it will prompt – and part of that will be a discussion that normal people have – some people will really not like it – and that gives for more conversation.
But, it is a trick you can only play a few times before people tire of it.

]]> http://www.simon-law.com/archives/391/comment-page-1#comment-768 David MacGregor Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:14:05 +0000 http://www.simon-law.com/archives/391#comment-768 I can't say that I agree. Why not simply 'sponsor' random material found on YouTube. I don't think that a post modern approach really works for advertising. I can’t say that I agree.
Why not simply ‘sponsor’ random material found on YouTube.
I don’t think that a post modern approach really works for advertising.

]]>