<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Citizen Journalism Mean The Loss Of Compassion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simon-law.com/archives/446/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simon-law.com/archives/446</link>
	<description>Sporadic thoughts - mostly about communications, brands, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:44:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.simon-law.com/archives/446/comment-page-1#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simon-law.com/archives/446#comment-886</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read the book, but Andrew&#039;s demeanour in the entire discussion was surprisingly truculent and his points seemed to spiral into the ridiculous way too quickly.

Having said that, it&#039;s a shame, because I suspect he has a good point hiding inside that wrath!

Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read the book, but Andrew&#8217;s demeanour in the entire discussion was surprisingly truculent and his points seemed to spiral into the ridiculous way too quickly.</p>
<p>Having said that, it&#8217;s a shame, because I suspect he has a good point hiding inside that wrath!</p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David MacGregor</title>
		<link>http://www.simon-law.com/archives/446/comment-page-1#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>David MacGregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simon-law.com/archives/446#comment-879</guid>
		<description>I have just submitted a review of the Cult book for publication in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.idealog.co.nz&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Idealog Magazine&lt;/a&gt;. I was less than impressed by the book and even less by its tone. This came to mind to describe it:

&lt;i&gt;“When an objection cannot be made formidable, there is some policy in trying to make it frightful; and to substitute the yell and the war-whoop, in the place of reason, argument, and good order.”&lt;/i&gt;—Thomas Paine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just submitted a review of the Cult book for publication in <a href="http://www.idealog.co.nz" rel="nofollow">Idealog Magazine</a>. I was less than impressed by the book and even less by its tone. This came to mind to describe it:</p>
<p><i>“When an objection cannot be made formidable, there is some policy in trying to make it frightful; and to substitute the yell and the war-whoop, in the place of reason, argument, and good order.”</i>—Thomas Paine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
