<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lovely Budweiser work&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simon-law.com/archives/727/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simon-law.com/archives/727</link>
	<description>Sporadic thoughts - mostly about communications, brands, etc...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:44:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.simon-law.com/archives/727/comment-page-1#comment-3557</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simon-law.com/archives/727#comment-3557</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s &quot;lovely&quot;...
As you say, &quot;Big budget, high production value&quot;.

It made me smile yesterday - in a &#039;nice stuff&#039; way. It was lovely to watch, pretty, beautifully edited to seem seamless, despite the changing scenes.

I&#039;ll accept your issues with it - it&#039;s not edgy, ballsy, funny... or anything like that. In fact, it&#039;s DEFINITELY not my favourite Budweiser ad. The message isn&#039;t clever. It doesn&#039;t stand out as being the best beer ad.

But that doesn&#039;t stop it from being a beautiful, warm-hearted, piece of film. That&#039;s why I liked it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;lovely&#8221;&#8230;<br />
As you say, &#8220;Big budget, high production value&#8221;.</p>
<p>It made me smile yesterday &#8211; in a &#8216;nice stuff&#8217; way. It was lovely to watch, pretty, beautifully edited to seem seamless, despite the changing scenes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll accept your issues with it &#8211; it&#8217;s not edgy, ballsy, funny&#8230; or anything like that. In fact, it&#8217;s DEFINITELY not my favourite Budweiser ad. The message isn&#8217;t clever. It doesn&#8217;t stand out as being the best beer ad.</p>
<p>But that doesn&#8217;t stop it from being a beautiful, warm-hearted, piece of film. That&#8217;s why I liked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.simon-law.com/archives/727/comment-page-1#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simon-law.com/archives/727#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>Really don&#039;t like that. It&#039;s a mobile phone ad, and a pretty lame one at that. &#039;All together now&#039;? Big budget, high production value wallpaper. I don&#039;t care that it was shot in an incredibly ornate way and took weeeeks to do - that&#039;s nonsense. 
Make me laugh, don&#039;t give me fluffy messages about togetherness.
Rant over. 
Why do you like it out of interest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really don&#8217;t like that. It&#8217;s a mobile phone ad, and a pretty lame one at that. &#8216;All together now&#8217;? Big budget, high production value wallpaper. I don&#8217;t care that it was shot in an incredibly ornate way and took weeeeks to do &#8211; that&#8217;s nonsense.<br />
Make me laugh, don&#8217;t give me fluffy messages about togetherness.<br />
Rant over.<br />
Why do you like it out of interest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
